Jannah Theme License is not validated, Go to the theme options page to validate the license, You need a single license for each domain name.

What is known so far in the Sally Rag vs. Monique Ryan case?

Key Point
  • Rugg tried to keep working after suing Dr. Ryan and the federal government for unfair job expectations.
  • A judge ruled that it was “unreasonable” for Mr. Wragg to continue working for MPs.
  • Both parties are expected to set a trial timeline and attend case management hearings in the coming weeks.
The judge said it was “totally unreasonable” to order independent MP Monique Ryan to continue cooperating with the staff who are suing her.
Sally Wragg has filed an emergency injunction in court to stop her from terminating her employment as Chief of Staff after claiming Dr. Ryan was forced to resign.
Mr. Rag wanted to continue his policy and media work as an adviser to Congressmen in Cooyong while pursuing wrongful dismissal allegations against Dr. Ryan and the Commonwealth.
Dr. Ryan gave a formal warning to Mr. Wragg, who flew with the novel coronavirus last November, according to court documents.

Dr. Ryan, a former pediatric neurologist and strong advocate for stricter COVID-19 rules, said it was “willfully selfish” for Rugg to fly when she was infected, and that her He said he had lost faith in the chief of staff.

Unfair Dismissal Claims and “Solid” Negotiations

Dr. Ryan hired Sally Rag, the former head of Change.org, last year. She came after successfully challenging then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg for the Kooyong seat in the federal election last year.
Lag alleges he was unfairly dismissed after being asked to work “unreasonable hours” of more than 70 hours a week for a salary of $166,000.
Mr. Rugg is seeking compensation and financial penalties from both parties, adding to her controversy a serious violation of the Fair Work Act against the Commonwealth.

A federal court in Melbourne was told on February 17 that the parties were unable to settle their unfair dismissal allegations after “solid” closed-door negotiations.

Dr. Ryan hired Sally Rag, the former head of Change.org, last year. She came after successfully challenging then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg for the Kooyong seat in the federal election last year. sauce: AAP / Joel Caret

During the hearing, Rugg and Dr. Ryan sat on opposite sides of the courtroom and did not recognize each other.

Federal barrister Nicholas Harrington said: “The arbitration, as is often the case, was a lively exchange of ideas and as a result a great deal of thought had to be done.

“After about four hours, mediation ended and was unsuccessful.”

where do they go from here?

Judge Debra Mortimer ruled that there was “no chance of a restoration of cooperation” between the two.
“Dr. Ryan can put all this aside and resume a constructive working relationship with Mr. Lag in what has proven to be a high pressure, very busy and demanding work environment. It’s not reasonable to argue that , or should be able to… the best time,” she wrote in her decision.
She said Ragg had failed to demonstrate to the court that he had a “strong desire” to continue working for Dr. Ryan.

Judge Mortimer said: “That evidence may have been given. Mr Wragg has not given it. He has given much evidence of her own ambitions, her desire to be in Canberra.”

“It was completely unreasonable to impose such an obligation on Dr. Ryan,” she said, even though Mr. Wragg had persuaded her that he was dedicated to working for Congress.
“The trial will, in any case, be hotly contested and subject to considerable scrutiny, especially as working relationships are resumed while the parties continue to prepare for the trial,” she said. rice field.
Judge Mortimer said Mr. Wragg’s allegations against Dr. Ryan were serious and could affect the legislator’s reputation, both personally and professionally.

Judge Mortimer has ordered the parties to determine a trial timeline and hold case management hearings in the coming weeks.

test case

Rag’s attorney, Josh Bornstein, said fines for willful and systematic violations of labor standards are up to $660,000.
“The allegations of serious violation were made in the context of Dr. Ryan’s public admission that his staff were working 70 hour weeks and that it was unsafe.
“Additionally, the Commonwealth has for many years taken notice that parliamentary officials are working unlawfully long hours for reasons such as investigations and reports to Congress.”
Bornstein said the social activist case is a test of what constitutes “reasonable” overtime or extra hours for congressional workers, and if successful it could have broader implications. said.
“If Mr Wragg’s case is successful, it will not only affect federal employees, but all Australians experiencing exploitation because of their contractual obligations to perform undefined ‘reasonable additional working hours’. It will open the door for further lawsuits, including class action lawsuits, against workers,” he said.
Last June, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese cut the number of independent and minor party MPs. Members of Parliament on the Crossbench were allowed to hire one adviser, from two advisers and her two aides, as part of the staffing during the new parliamentary term.

In a statement, Dr Ryan said the additional charges have been dismissed and will be defended, but no further comment will be made as the matter is in court.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/sally-rugg-vs-monique-ryan-what-we-know-so-far-about-the-case/uksluh1wx What is known so far in the Sally Rag vs. Monique Ryan case?

Related Articles

Back to top button