- Rugg tried to keep working after suing Dr. Ryan and the federal government for unfair job expectations.
- A judge ruled that it was “unreasonable” for Mr. Wragg to continue working for MPs.
- Both parties are expected to set a trial timeline and attend case management hearings in the coming weeks.
Dr. Ryan, a former pediatric neurologist and strong advocate for stricter COVID-19 rules, said it was “willfully selfish” for Rugg to fly when she was infected, and that her He said he had lost faith in the chief of staff.
Unfair Dismissal Claims and “Solid” Negotiations
A federal court in Melbourne was told on February 17 that the parties were unable to settle their unfair dismissal allegations after “solid” closed-door negotiations.
Dr. Ryan hired Sally Rag, the former head of Change.org, last year. She came after successfully challenging then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg for the Kooyong seat in the federal election last year. sauce: AAP / Joel Caret
During the hearing, Rugg and Dr. Ryan sat on opposite sides of the courtroom and did not recognize each other.
“After about four hours, mediation ended and was unsuccessful.”
where do they go from here?
Judge Mortimer said: “That evidence may have been given. Mr Wragg has not given it. He has given much evidence of her own ambitions, her desire to be in Canberra.”
Judge Mortimer has ordered the parties to determine a trial timeline and hold case management hearings in the coming weeks.
In a statement, Dr Ryan said the additional charges have been dismissed and will be defended, but no further comment will be made as the matter is in court.
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/sally-rugg-vs-monique-ryan-what-we-know-so-far-about-the-case/uksluh1wx What is known so far in the Sally Rag vs. Monique Ryan case?