The T20 World Cup is about to begin.
The T20 World Cup has already begun.
We sat down enjoying the musical prelude, gathering and entertaining the most catchy songs before the curtains went up, revealing the main stage, which was set to the biggest name.
Did you see Papua New Guinea’s stunning defense interrupted by a series of dives, jumping catches?
Or, the astounding splendor of four wickets of four balls of Curtis Camphor, one of the rarest bowling feats in cricket, has sparked a ridiculous and fierce debate that only cricket can offer. Should I call it a “double hat trick” (there are 5 forces and 10 forces, so you probably need to add Cam-phors to your lexicon) “?
Or the heroes of Gerhard Erasmus and David Weise who drove Namibia to a historic victory over Ireland and Super 12. This is about as spectacular as Weese’s brilliant mane.
Perhaps I was too busy watching the warm-up match. Aside from measuring the form and collecting the starting lineup, it’s a hitout that doesn’t make sense in the overall context of the tournament.
The ICC T20 World Cup is an excellent tournament, concise and efficient compared to over 50 versions, and domestic tournaments have no global gravity.
You can also see a much wider range of players and styles than any other format that seems to be suitable for cricket expansion.
Under the current system, only full member countries have the right to participate directly in the Super 12 stages of the World Cup.
The top seven rankings and the host country (India in this case) automatically participated in the main event, but Sri Lanka and Bangladesh had to fight other qualifiers.
The other six teams won entries by participating in the qualifying event for two years, but had to qualify again during the group exclusion phase. It’s like being invited to a party and being told you need to stand outside through the window. You’re not wearing a shirt with a collar, so you’re a drinker inside.
In most sports, participating in the World Cup gives you the right to play on the other side and, in some cases, to lose.
However, cricket too often retains the air of an exclusive club, down to the use of terms such as full member and associates.
Whisper quietly, but there is a clear selfish motivation for those who have it to keep out those who do not. The memories of more than 50 World Cups in 2007, when India was eliminated on the group stage after losing to Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, still tremble through managers and broadcasters who see success through valuation and the Prism of the Dollar.
And England may be happy not to face the Netherlands again in a short tournament after losing their encounter in the 2009 and 2014 editions.
This is not an ICC bashing exercise. The organization provides financial support for the development of cricket in associate countries, and there are many passionate people working at the ICC who are dedicated to developing and improving professionalism around the world. ..
Still, the current system remains an unpleasant compromise between providing a moment in the sun and preventing the largest draw card from burning.
It is argued that allowing only four qualifiers up to Super 12 reduces the chances of a one-sided match and promotes closer encounters.
But the last men’s ICC tournament, which had a decent number of teams (14 in all), changed that theory head-on.
Some of the games involving at least one associate team were the tightest and most thrilling contests (Scotland vs. Afghanistan, United Arab Emirates vs. Ireland, Ireland vs. Zimbabwe, etc.).
Yes, there were some explosions, as in any World Cup in any code, but some of the most biased results involved two full member sides. England clashed in the first three games against Australia, New Zealand and Sri Lanka, while South Africa defeated the West Indies with 257 runs. Even the finals were a bit of a contest. Australia overwhelmed New Zealand and won 7 wickets with 101 balls remaining.
But the 2015 World Cup was too good for expansionists. The game admin has corrected the exaggerated decision to close the world stage again and return to the World Cup for 10 teams, also known as the Champions. Trophy plus 2.
The current T20 version is better, but it’s designed to keep out many new nations as long as qualifying rounds exist (and don’t call it “minnow” and patronize it further). The idea of true egalitarian expansion in a place of equal competition is just a mirage.
However, there is hope for future associate teams. Next year’s T20 World Cup in Australia will be the last opportunity for countries to go through the qualifying process.
The 2024 tournament will be expanded to 20 teams, playing in four groups of five each before advancing to the Super 8 stage.
And at the 2027 50 Overworld Cup, 14 teams will participate in two groups of seven people.
It’s the equality that Associates have begged for.
In the meantime, we would like to thank Oman, Ireland, the Netherlands and Papua New Guinea for their contributions to the wonderful week of international cricket. At least, the possibility of another slope is not too far away.
And when Scotland and Namibia emerge from their wings and enter into the full glare of the footlights, which are no longer part of the warm-up act, we can hope that Scotland and Namibia will do their best. ..
The T20 World Cup qualifying stage is about to end.It can’t happen right away
Source link The T20 World Cup qualifying stage is about to end.It can’t happen right away