Business

The federal budget can fall off the “debt cliff.”Researchers say FINA’s decisions are based on “opinions, not science.”

In effect, the decision to ban transgender women from elite-level international competition is based on opinion, not science, Australian researchers say the jury has a biological advantage over cisgender women. He says he is discussing whether he has one.

FINA, the world’s swimming organization, adopted a new “gender inclusion policy” on Sunday

Loading

This allows only swimmers who have transitioned before the age of 12 to participate in women’s events. The organization also proposed establishing a working group to establish an “open category” for transgender women at several events as part of its new policy.

FINA’s decision, which is the toughest decision from the Olympic sports organization, is for transgender athletes from men to women.They can establish the comfortable satisfaction of FINA They have not experienced any part of male puberty beyond Tanner Stage 2 [which marks the start of physical development in puberty] Or before the age of 12, whichever is later. “

Associate Professor Ada Cheung, a leading endocrine scholar at Austin Health, said medical transitions have a variety of complex effects on the body, raising questions about whether this leads to the biological benefits of trans women in sports. I did.

“It’s not really clear if transgender women have a biological advantage over cisgender women because the science isn’t clear,” he said. Transhealth Research ProgramSaid in partnership with the University of Melbourne.

“FINA’s report is actually based on people’s opinions and is not a gold standard. No research has actually been conducted on transgender female swimmers or elite athletes. Judges have come out.”

Read the full article here..

The federal budget can fall off the “debt cliff.”Researchers say FINA’s decisions are based on “opinions, not science.”

Source link The federal budget can fall off the “debt cliff.”Researchers say FINA’s decisions are based on “opinions, not science.”

Related Articles

Back to top button