Labor frontbencher Tannya Privask Liberal democracy can and must face unpleasant truths, saying that, to be honest with the past, “totalitarians, that is, those who want to erase unpleasant memories from public life.” It separates us. “
The Shadow Minister of Education uses a speech in Sydney on Tuesday night to compare the permanent criticism of the federal education minister-led national curriculum. Alan Tudge, To the authoritarian deletion of the past.
Tudge spent months Campaign for proposed new curriculum elements, He says students do not want to leave school because of the “hate” of their country.The minister argued that Anzac Day “should be presented as Australia’s most sacred day.” Not “fought”..
Refer to the proposed 9th year curriculum, Tudge said, “Anzac Day is not presented as Australia’s most sacred day, but to commemorate the 100,000 people who died for our freedom, where we stop … it’s a contested idea. Presented as “.
Presque will provide reposts using lectures at the Parliament of New South Wales. She argues that honest history is a hallmark of free society and the basis of all moral progress. She would argue that supporters of the Liberal Democratic Party and a free and open society “face our commitment to truth and collapse.”
“It’s one of the things that separates us from totalitarians-people who want to erase unpleasant memories from public life,” she says.
Presque, she is “essentially optimistic and a patriot who loves her country deeply, but how can she study Galipoli’s courage without admitting that Britain’s orders were wrong? “Is it?”
Thinking of the truth of Gallipoli’s landing as “a very dangerous bet, a hindsight and false bet” does not undermine the courage and sacrifice of the Australian army.
“If anything, the perfect truth weighs on their tragedy and courage,” says Preversk. “When we study history, we teach not only victory and victory as courage. It is resistance and even defeat.”
She argues that history is basically a quest for truth, and in the absence of complete truth, its efforts are publicity, not scholarship.
“If you pull a thread because you don’t like the tapestry, the whole picture will collapse.
“How can we teach the history of China without the Long March, the Cultural Revolution, and Tiananmen Square? How can we teach the history of the United States without slavery, the North-South War, and Freedom Ride?
“How can we teach the history of ancient Rome without the brutality and slaughter of winning the empire and paying for art, poetry, trade, architecture and political glory?”
Preversek would argue that honest history does not always lead to criticism, or that it means that the citizens of the country “give up their faith in redemption and forgiveness.”
She will find that some of the greatest civilizations on the planet are checking history and prospering because they are ready to learn the lessons of the past.
Presque admits that rendering past events is complicated because no one has complete knowledge. The source is spotted and “the bridge between time and culture may be too long to cross.”
She says there is always debate about past events and highlights, but subjectivity becomes an issue when a minister of education like Tudge tries to impose choices on Australian students.
Presque argues that Tudge wants the curriculum to reflect his own politics rather than the quest for truth and “import the ridiculous American historical war into the Australian classroom.”
“Serious athletes, business leaders and scientists don’t think ignoring past achievements will still improve,” Shadow’s Minister of Education said Tuesday night. “They do the opposite.
“They investigate. They analyze. They look for weaknesses-they are hungry for truth because it helps them improve.”
Tanya Privask Reposts Alan Tudge’s Campaign Against National Curriculum | Australian News
Source link Tanya Privask Reposts Alan Tudge’s Campaign Against National Curriculum | Australian News