Jannah Theme License is not validated, Go to the theme options page to validate the license, You need a single license for each domain name.
Sydney

No 10 refuses to deny that Sunak received an informal warning of Raab’s actions before making him deputy prime minister.politics

No 10 refuses to deny Sunak was unofficially warned of Raab’s handling of officials before appointing him deputy prime minister

Downing Street has refused to deny that Rishi Sunak was privately warned of Dominic Raab’s treatment of officials before appointing him as attorney general and deputy prime minister.After PMQ When asked about this at a lobby briefing, a spokesman for the prime minister said:

The Prime Minister was not aware of any formal complaints at the time of appointing Dominic Raab.

Pushing further, she said:

I’m not sure what your definition of informal complaint is.pet [propriety and ethics team] The process is very clear.

Appointments and normal processes were followed, and no formal complaints were received.

Today, The Times reports that Sunak was warned of Raab’s actions before appointing him. (look 10:31 a.m.)

important event

filter beta

Labor Party says MP Kim Johnson’s call of Israeli government ‘fascist’ is ‘unacceptable’

Kiran Stacy

Labor MP Kim Johnson Summoned to meet the party leader after calling Israel a “fascist” and “apartheid state” in the prime minister’s question. , five days after Holocaust Remembrance Day.

Labor officials then quickly condemned Johnson’s words. kia starmer We call them “unacceptable”.

Mr Johnson said:

Human rights abuses against Palestinians, including children, have increased since the election of the fascist Israeli government last December.

Can you tell us how the Prime Minister challenges what Amnesty International and other human rights groups call an apartheid state?

A Sturmer spokesperson then said:

I think the words she used were totally unacceptable. Chief Whip will speak to her later today.

As a first step, we obviously want her to retract the statement she used.

Mr Johnson won the seat in 2019 after his predecessor, Dame Louise Ellman, resigned as Labor MP over the party’s failure to tackle anti-Semitism.

No 10 refuses to deny Sunak was unofficially warned of Raab’s handling of officials before appointing him deputy prime minister

Downing Street did not deny that Rishi Sunak had been warned privately about the treatment of civil servants before appointing Dominic Raab as Attorney General and Deputy Prime Minister. When asked about this in a post-PMQ lobby briefing, a spokesman for the prime minister said:

The Prime Minister was not aware of any formal complaints at the time of appointing Dominic Raab.

Pushing further, she said:

I’m not sure what your definition of informal complaint is.pet [propriety and ethics team] The process is very clear.

Appointments and normal processes were followed, and no formal complaints were received.

Today, The Times reports that Sunak was warned of Raab’s actions before appointing him. (look 10:31 a.m.)

PMQ – Snap Verdict

the most interesting thing today PMQ It didn’t come out. For millions of Britons today’s strike will be the political story of the day, but while parliament is considered to be the place where important issues are smashed, one party, Or giving disproportionate airtime to topics where both have clear partisan advantages. discussing.

Massive strikes were not completely ignored.However, Sturmer is vulnerable on the topic because he has not gotten a convincing answer on how Labor will solve the problem, and since Stryker is more popular than him, Snak is also happy to take up the issue. (see 9:45 a.m.)

Instead, for the second week in a row, Starmer focused on the sleaze. Scandals usually lose most of their news traction after a minister resigns. Because the world is moving, and only Westminster proceduralists have a great deal of interest in ‘who knew what when?’ Questions left. But today’s starmer didn’t sound like someone heading for an unrelated impasse. He made it work and delivered a powerful hit job.

In part, Starmer ensured the question “who knew what when” ( 12:06 pm When 12.08pm) It was concise and precise. His first intervention was much shorter than usual. connected by drawing similarities to

Therefore, regarding his former chairman, his defense is as follows. No one told me. I didn’t know Are you going to claim that the Prime Minister was the only person who was completely unaware of allegations of serious bullying against the Deputy Prime Minister prior to appointing him?

Sturmer is a former prosecutor, and prosecutors like to establish patterns of behavior.

Perhaps most importantly, Sturmer linked this as follows: boris johnsonis a particularly good line in his fourth question.

He’s like one of his predecessors who treated behavioral questions as sweeping. He believed that avoiding responsibility was a perfectly reasonable response for the prime minister. At least, to be fair, his predecessors never pretended he was an example of integrity and accountability.

Was it a coincidence that the two men who placed £800,000 in credit on the former Prime Minister were shortlisted for the BBC and British Council’s Plum post on that matter?

Sunak wants to be seen as a completely different person than Johnson. But his reaction to Sturmer at this point sounded like Johnson’s defense ( 12:11 p.m.), This is a big problem. Unless he openly denounces his successor in much stronger terms than before, voters will not see him as a perfect contrast.

As Conservative MP Steve Bryne said over the weekend, his party was suffering from a “long Boris” and Sturmer took advantage of it.

However, it was not a one-sided victory. Starmer easily won his two exchanges in the first, but Sunak counterattacked very effectively in his third question, attacking his Starmer who failed to support Rosie Duffield.

If [Starmer] I care so much about what people are saying and how they behave in public, but recently one of my members of parliament was forced to speak out.

And it turns out that his own office undermines her. He should support her and her colleagues, but if he cannot be trusted to stand up for the women in his party, he cannot be trusted to stand up for Britain.

Many would not have followed Duffield’s story. However, this serves as a line of attack, as the Tories are not the only ones who think Duffield has been treated badly by her party.

And in his next reply, Sunak made a similar attack, portraying Starmer as unprincipled.

When I learned of the formal complaint, I directed a major independent KC to conduct an investigation.

But what he said over the weekend was that hatred had not been allowed to spread to Labor under his predecessor. He spoke as if he wasn’t there.

But he sat right next to him and supported him for four years without a challenge. We never make a fuss and stand up for important principles.

Jeremy Corbyn’s era felt so much like ancient history that just winning the contest wasn’t enough. But this line of attack works to an extent, as Tories aren’t the only ones who view Starmer as unprincipled.

Overall, Sunak still had issues. But it was fairer than some of the recent PMQs where he lost badly.

Sir John Hayes (Con) seeks assurance that the government will pass legislation to stop small boats.

(He is a close friend of Home Secretary Suera Braverman, who gave an interview to The Daily Telegraph published yesterday, insinuating that she worries about the government backing down on the issue. )

snack The government says it will introduce legislation to make it clear that people who enter the UK illegally cannot stay.

that’s all. PMQ finished.

Kim Johnson (Lab) asks Sunak to denounce the Israeli government’s “fascist” policies.

snack Johnson says he did not mention attacks by Palestinians. He urges both sides to work for peace.

Shailesh Vala (Con) that British sovereignty Northern Ireland protocol.

snack He says he can give that guarantee.

Christine Jardine (Lib Dem) visited a charity that deals with metastatic breast cancer over the weekend.

snack The government says it is investing heavily in this. He confirms that the British and Scottish governments are cooperating on this.

Ian BlackfordA former SNP leader from Westminster, he asked if Sunak ever thought that the only thing the Tories have been good at is pushing people into poverty.

snack Blackford contacted me again and said it was great. He said poverty, inequality and lower wages were all lower than when the Tories took office.

Neil Hudson (Con) asks about voters who have lost their daughters to suicide and who are campaigning to raise awareness of suicide.does the prime minister show respect father of threeand meet with them to discuss this?

snack He says he respects his father. He happily says he would like to meet them.

Mary Kelly Foy (Lab) once said Sunak had no working class friends. So he may not know that he has half a million workers on strike.

snack Teachers say they’ve had the best raises and record investment in training in 30 years. Children deserve to go to school. Workers should say the strike is wrong, he said.

Jerome Mayhew (Con) says Norfolk has no place to train as a dentist. The government will consider setting it up at the University of East Anglia.

snack He says there are 400 dentists in Norfolk who are ‘working for the NHS’.



https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2023/feb/01/rishi-sunak-pmqs-keir-starmer-mass-strikes-teachers-trains-rail-border-uk-politics-live No 10 refuses to deny that Sunak received an informal warning of Raab’s actions before making him deputy prime minister.politics

Related Articles

Back to top button