Documents Commissioned by Miller Group Newspapers Alleged to Show ‘Huge Number’ of Illegal Activities Seen in Court – What Happened | Daily Mirror

userMay 11, 2023

Court presents documents commissioned by Miller Group Newspapers that barrister claims show ‘huge number’ of illegal activities

Sherborne presented documents showing “huge numbers” of illegal activities requested by Miller Group newspaper.

He cites several occasions when he paid companies run by the group. Jonathan Reesewas convicted in 1999 of conspiring to distort the direction of the judiciary and conducted investigations on behalf of various newspapers.

important event

summary

The court was buzzing that day, but Sherborne was still in the middle of opening. Here’s a summary of what he said in court at today’s hearing:

Mr. Sherborne has outlined the lawsuit he alleges that senior Miller Group newspaper staff acted with apparent awareness that their articles had been obtained through unlawful means. We will focus on some of the examples mentioned. He said the court will hear a “huge amount” of illegal activity evidence commissioned by Miller Group Newspapers.
He told the court that the pattern was that stories were published without asking subjects for comment, then retracted by newspapers when threatened with formal action. Sherborne said this indicated that staff knew what was being done to collect information was illegal and could not risk exposing it in defending their story. said that
One example he gave was a story about David Beckham. He said People ran an article that said the former football player called him but then retracted the call when he and his wife filed a complaint.
Other examples included stories about Les Dennis and Amanda Holden, Prince Michael of Kent. Sherborne said in court that these follow a pattern and are suggestive. Piers Morgan He must have known what was going on—in fact, he was ‘directly’ involved.

Sherborne also cites the following cases: David and Victoria BeckhamHe said People called the children’s former nanny and accused her of launching a hate campaign.

Again, he says, the newspaper quickly surrendered when they filed a complaint because staff knew the story was based on illegally obtained information.

Quoting a People magazine journalist, David Brown, many articles said it was obtained by “cheating” cell phones, and Sherborne said in court that meant hacking. Mr. Sherborne said Mr. Brown used Beckham’s story as an example.

The Court is currently considering the following cases: Rio FerdinandAccording to Sherborne, he was the subject of a front-page story in The Mirror and was “ridden” with illegally obtained information. He said this was another story not investigated by the paper’s legal department.

Sherborne gives the following example of a concrete story. Les Denisex-wife of TV presenter Amanda Holden and actor Emily Simmons He said this was based on information obtained from voicemail messages by a research firm that later found that TDI was involved in the phone hack.

He said newspapers have outlined a pattern in which they publish stories they believe to be true without speaking to those involved, and then retract official complaints when threatened. .

Sherborne argues this indicates that the journalists were writing stories based on information they knew they were not allowed to have.

Court presents documents commissioned by Miller Group Newspapers that barrister claims show ‘huge number’ of illegal activities

Sherborne presented documents showing “huge numbers” of illegal activities requested by Miller Group newspaper.

He said this morning that MGN’s board has a “vested interest” in the “growing” knowledge that illegal intelligence gathering goes undisclosed. Sherborne claimed such conduct was permitted at the company’s “highest levels.”

He told the High Court that “as the story progressed, so did the committee’s knowledge,” amid “increasing knowledge of the wider range of activities.”

Sherborne said the “impact” on shareholders should be kept in mind should this come to light.

They have a very clear vested interest in this being out of the public eye and no one being able to sue.

Attorneys for the publisher say they have provided evidence from board members denying any knowledge of illegal information-gathering activities.

MGN spokesperson Andrew Green KC said in a filing that the dukes had made “substantial allegations” of impropriety in legal arguments that were “far from adequate.”

Plaintiffs have not provided direct evidence that members of the board of directors or the legal department made false or dishonest statements.

Here are some more details about the comments Sherborne made in court this morning.as we previously reportedHe said Morgan was “at the heart” of the allegations against the publisher for alleged illegal information gathering.

Sherborne, Representing the Duke of Sussex and Other Individuals Taking Legal Challenges Against The Miller Group newspaper (MGN) said:

What we do know is that Mr Morgan was directly involved in many of these incidents. In many ways, Morgan is at the center of this issue. He was a very hands-on editor and had a very close relationship with the board.

In summary, Sherborne said Morgan published an article on Prince Michael of Kent’s finances without checking with him, then added yet another. When first challenged, Morgan initially defended the story, he says.

However, as the prince’s prosecution progressed and it became clear that the story’s information had been obtained through “illegal means,” Morgan and the Mirror retracted and apologized. said in court.

David Sherborne summarizes elements he has previously presented, including a complaint to the Mirror by lawyers for Prince Michael of Kent about an article published in the newspaper. Sherborne said in court that the information in the article was obtained through illegal means.

They are back in court today to resume proceedings.

Here’s an overview Piers Morgan In his own words, he knew about phone hacking from a colleague. Jim Waterson:

Court is up for lunch now and will be back soon.

Miller used ‘illegal means’ for article on Prince Michael of Kent, solicitor says

Sherborne developed the client’s allegation that the Mirror used illegal means to set up an article about Prince Michael of Kent’s debts, and that Morgan was aware of the fact because the article was vigorously denied. However, the paper felt that it was the case and there was enough evidence to do it anyway.

Sherborne said Morgan was informed of the denial but decided to go public and later defended the case in correspondence with royal representatives.

Lawyers claim evidence will show Piers Morgan’s ‘direct involvement’

Sherborne further argues that the evidence will reveal Morgan’s “direct involvement” in, and knowledge of, the issues central to the trial.

Sherborne alleges that Morgan was central to the operation of the Mirror, and that hacking was a regular occurrence. Not only because he was the editor-in-chief of the daily newspaper, but also because he was particularly close to the members of the board.

Court finds editor personally involved in widespread phone hack at Miller Group newspaper

Jim Waterson

Phone hacking rampant at Miller Group newspaper newspaper It was argued in the High Court that even the editor was personally involved.

David Sherbornea lawyer in the case of the alleged victim. prince harrysaid phone hacking was rampant in the mid-2000s. Richard Wallace’s daily mirror, Tina Weaver’s sunday mirror and Mark Thomas people.

He argued that top tabloid editors were aware of what was going on and were sometimes actively involved in illegally accessing voicemails. The lawyer argued that

All three were prolific hackers and users of illegal information gathering.

All three editors have since resigned from the newspaper, but Mr. Wallace now holds a job at the newspaper. Rupert Murdoch’s Talk TV channel.This means he is the star presenter’s boss Piers Morgan – accused of being aware of a phone hack in Mirror.

Lawyers are scrutinizing documents purported to provide background to the evidence the court will hear. I’ll let you know the details of the evidence once the court hearing is held.

Second day of phone hacking trial begins

good morning.Welcome to Guardian’s live coverage of phone hacking allegations against Miller’s group newspaper at the High Court in London.

this is the first one Prince Harry’s Three phone-hacking cases against British newspaper groups are set to go to trial, and the royal family is waiting to see if the courts will allow two separate lawsuits against the parent companies of The Sun and the Daily Mail.

Yesterday, a court heard the former Mirror Editor-in-Chief’s claims. Piers Morgan The newspaper knew about illegal phone hacking “on an industrial scale.”

Morgan is now presenting Rupert Murdoch’s TalkTV has always denied intentionally commissioning or publishing stories based on illegally obtained voicemails.

Witnesses said in court Wednesday they heard Morgan openly discussing how the phone hack took place.

read my colleague Jim Waterson’s Read the full minutes of Wednesday’s meeting here:

https://www.theguardian.com/media/live/2023/may/11/piers-morgan-prince-harry-mirror-group-newspapers-phone-hacking-trial-latest-news-updates Documents Commissioned by Miller Group Newspapers Alleged to Show ‘Huge Number’ of Illegal Activities Seen in Court – What Happened | Daily Mirror

userMay 11, 2023