Sydney

Queensland, Western Australia’s move to provide Pfizer vaccine over the 1960s, ridiculed by epidemiologists

Annastacia Palaszczuk has been accused of “boosting young people” by making the Pfizer vaccine available in Queenslander, over the age of 60.

The Queensland Prime Minister followed in the footsteps of Western Australia and South Australia on Wednesday, shocking top epidemiologists.

Jab rates in Queensland are sluggish for people under the age of 40 in a confusing rhetoric from Prime Minister and Chief Health Officer Janet Young on supply shortages and the safety of AstraZeneca’s alternatives. ..

Many younger age groups are still struggling to get Pfizer’s appointment, but on Wednesday Ms. Paraschuk received a “loud” call from the infamous Vaccine Controversy Demographics and preferred administration of those people. He said the quantity would be further expanded.

“They told me loudly and clearly that they wanted to make a vaccine choice, well I would give them that,” she told Congress on Wednesday.

Leading epidemiologist Mary-Louise McCrows was astonished by the announcement, claiming that the young Queenslander was once again pushed behind the line.

Camera iconThe move has been criticized for pushing the young Queenslander behind the line. NCA NewsWire / Dan Peled credit: News Corp Australia

In Sunshine, less than 16% of people aged 20-24 are fully vaccinated, 18.3% of people aged 25-29 are both vaccinated, and over 21% of people aged 30-34 are fully vaccinated. I am vaccinated.

“I was shocked,” a world-renowned epidemiologist at the University of New South Wales told NCA NewsWire. “Why do they do this?

“The biggest risk of getting and spreading it is between the ages of 16 and 39.”

Professor McLaws said that as a result of Covid-19, older people are at increased risk of hospitalization and death. Covid-19 is significantly reduced by the first and second doses of AstraZeneca.

“It does not improve the risk reduction for symptomatic or asymptomatic infections,” she said. “That’s much better for Pfizer, but that’s why it gives it to young people, because young people are at higher risk of transmitting it. And Pfizer has symptomatic and asymptomatic infections. It has a much higher effect on prevention. “

She said the reason Ms. Paraschuk provided to provide options to those who were reluctant was police officers who could not provide protection to most of the state.

“It’s great, but the choice (giving Pfizer to people over the age of 60) goes beyond the ability of young people who didn’t actually have the option to access the vaccine until August,” said the professor. I did.

“It’s a poor public health approach. If they had all the vaccine supplies and it was infinite, absolutely open it up to those who haven’t taken Pfizer and Moderna yet. But so. Not.

“Why do you put another barrier in front of (young people) by putting others in front of them?”

“Youth have been ignored. They have been placed behind the queue twice. Give the youth a break.”

COVID SYDNEY
Camera iconWhile waiting for a jab for a long time, vaccination rates are low in young Queensland. NCA NewsWire / Jeremy Piper credit: News Corp Australia

Ms Palaszczuk said she was able to provide the vaccine to anyone who wanted it, as she received 190,000 doses of vaccine from the federal government this week.

However, Professor McLaws said that this distribution is only part of what is needed for the younger age group, who are still waiting for their turn.

She said that about 3 million doses are needed just to protect 16-39 years old.

“I’m really very disappointed because the leadership (in Queensland) was impressed with how they wanted to take care of young people and reduce their risk of thrombosis,” the professor said. rice field.

“But now, to give in to the elderly, in irrational fear, is now to put the young man back in line again.”

Chris Moy, vice president of the Australian Medical Association, said he understood the frustration of young Queenslanders, but argued that a move to open vaccines was needed to protect the most vulnerable people.

“It’s a realistic decision to shut down the riskiest groups and simplify the whole thing,” he told NCA NewsWire.

“AstraZeneca remains a good vaccine, and some recent data said it could be better than Pfizer in the long run.

“We are in a position where it seems difficult for the (old) group to be vaccinated because the group that was resisting is still resisting.

“Partly because of the combination of complacency and just trying hard.”

Queensland, Western Australia’s move to provide Pfizer vaccine over the 1960s, ridiculed by epidemiologists

Source link Queensland, Western Australia’s move to provide Pfizer vaccine over the 1960s, ridiculed by epidemiologists

Related Articles

Back to top button