Australia & World

Language evolves to reflect society – transgender people are part of that society | Zoe Williams

NSPerhaps this is only true in middle age, but the social cessation caused by the pandemic, coupled with the acceleration of discord in some major areas, is to meet friends you have agreed to for a lifetime and find yourself. Means you can be on the other side of the “transdebate”. The phrase is euphemistic and insulting, and we enclose it in reverse commas to pretend to be an unresolved question of what is actually more existential.

One side of the debate does not consider transgender people to be genuine. They may feel what they are feeling, but the rest of us don’t have to join them in that reality. If someone tried to get me involved in the animal rights debate, I first had to prove that the animal existed, but ask me to come back later.

Nevertheless, here I was discussing the language with my friends. An example was raised in a training course at Doula (a freelance, New Age childbirth partner). A transgender woman wanted to attend the class, so the teaching doula had a reservation, but she agreed. To be honest, I didn’t know what the reservation was. Doula is personally engaged. If a transgender woman has a problem, we simply don’t hire it.

The only objection I could make to God was if I thought that a non-Sith woman did not belong around childbirth. But the space has been unisex for years. When my son was born in 2007, my ex-husband sent a poetic text to his parents, “Born on 11.24 by the hands of Big Ben” (we were in St. Thomas), and His mother was a midwife called Ben who we thought we had. Male midwives were the norm. It was just fun because I had a lot of drugs, and there’s a lot to be said for capital letters.

But let’s get back to the language problem. A friend of mine told me that transgender Doula continues to oppose the word “mother.” This made the class impossible. Their claim was that the use of inclusive language led to the elimination of women-specific languages, explaining the fact that transgender and women’s rights are in zero-sum games. Including one will inevitably cancel the other. I disagree.

On right-wing news sites such as Breitbart and Federalists, it’s a big bugbear that all transgender people are trying to ban the word “mother.” In the medical context, it is true that trans-gender men do not want to be treated as mothers. This is because transgender is forced to choose between personal and parental identities. We will never mention our mother again. I also had a lot of conversations with transgender people about their mothers.

I also hate being called a “mother” when making medical appointments. Even Sith women need to choose between becoming an adult whose name is mentioned in the memo or (ideally) a biological function while wearing clothes. It is understood that I do not encapsulate and represent every Sith woman, so I can retain that view without insulting every mother everywhere. It’s one of the many ways I know I’m not personally oppressed: another is that I didn’t get angry with the discussion or love my friends. Part of being an ally is to realize that you are not the main character and not summon someone else’s wounds to feel it for yourself.

These are the components of a gender-critical debate about language. First, let’s take a look at basic terms such as “mother,” “breastfeeding,” and “female.” The world cannot be explained without it. Second, transgender people say they want to replace it with words that sound totally foreign or unpronounceable: “caregiver,” “chest feeding,” and “womxn.” Then claim that anyone who slips will be immediately attacked or canceled. This case is often evidenced by a medical, scientific, or academic document – ​​a lancet, an NHS leaflet to staff, or an adaptation of Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s citation by the American Civil Liberties Union. This emphasizes the claim of wholeness that the language has been changed by radicals without general consent. In fact, especially in the medical field, the NHS does not meet the demands of transgender people. It’s just trying to get the most out of how experts can stay ahead of the accident. When you’re trying to take care of someone in an extreme situation, such as giving birth, you’re not making rules for society, you’re just trying to build trust.

One transgender person who opposes any words must act as an ambassador to each other. The final conclusion is that most of the time you don’t say it. If you are not allowed to say “female”, where does it leave the woman? But just as often, it is spoken as a gauntlet – if we let them change these words, “we have to revolutionize the most common modes of thinking and expression. Hmm. To protect our most familiar language. ” Sorry, but as you can imagine, this isn’t really a recent quote. It is the leader of the Times since 1870, unearthed by the philosopher Amia Srinivasan, and the newspaper opposes the suffragette movement, which wanted a transition from generics. Exclusive “he” in the electoral language so that the right to vote does not extend to men only. You may need to change the language.

Ultimately, transgender people have justice and equality – they must be. What is the alternative – a real human living a semi-underground life? On the way there, people misunderstand each other, hurt each other, feel frustrated, boxed, and feel unaware of the new terrain. The important thing is to always operate in good faith.

Language evolves to reflect society – transgender people are part of that society | Zoe Williams

Source link Language evolves to reflect society – transgender people are part of that society | Zoe Williams

Related Articles

Back to top button