The head of the Victorian corruption group has made suggestions that he ignored or did not address the welfare issues of Witnesses who knew it was wrong.
IBAC Commissioner Robert Redrich said in a parliamentary investigation Monday that a sincere group prioritized witnessing welfare, despite no statutory obligations.
“There is no suggestion that we ignored such information and did not address the welfare issue when it was simply known to be wrong,” Redlich told the Honesty and Oversight Commission. ..
Former Mayor of Casey Amanda Stapledon was found dead just days after receiving an IBAC draft report on alleged corruption in January. She had no suspicious circumstances surrounding her death.
Redlich also reported that some witnesses submitted evidence privately rather than in hearing after refusing to say whether Prime Minister Daniel Andrews was secretly interrogated as part of an IBAC investigation. I was also asked why.
“It is widely reported that some Witnesses heard the evidence in public and others heard the evidence in private,” said Brad Rousswell, a member of the Liberal Commission. ..
“In relation to those Witnesses … I want to understand if the evidence was heard privately based on the decision made by IBAC.”
As far as he knows, Redlich said no witness had asked for a private hearing over the hearing.
“Sure, there was no such request if you were thinking,” he added.
Redlich said the decision to ask witnesses privately in parallel with the ongoing public inspection was based on whether the IBAC was able to meet the criteria under the law.
Redlich said the special report published on public testing included reasons for testing witnesses, either publicly or privately.
“If the decision is made to look up the Witness personally, it’s because one or more criteria aren’t met,” he said.
“And there is no speculation about these issues, as it would be good for everyone if we could get these special reports into the public domain early.”
At the hearing, Redlich was pressured on how the Witnesses would be treated if they learned that the IBAC had mental health problems.
“Then make decisions based on credible information that the person will be treated personally?” Asked Kim Wells, a member of the Freedom Commission.
“Of course, or not at all,” Redlich replied.
“Mr. Wells, during my time as a commissioner, I don’t know that the Commission owns information that suggests that a person has mental or welfare issues, or suicidal ideation. I would like to guarantee. “It was dealt with to ensure that the welfare of the witnesses was protected. “
Redlich said the general public had “a lot of false information” about how the welfare of witnesses was treated at the IBAC hearing.
Sincere organizations must be content with the exceptional circumstances that exist to justify investigating Witnesses for the public good, and their reputation and well-being may be “unjustified”. is not.
Rowswell said there were cases of suicide before being cut off by chairman Harriet Shing for violating the Commission’s rules.
The Commission was limited to scrutinizing the performance of sincere institutions and was still prohibited from mentioning individual issues related to inquiries on foot.
However, Redlich said the IBAC is “eager” to address the concerns.
“We want the opportunity to satisfy all members of the Commission as completely as possible, so that that particular event does not cause concern for the Commission. Is particularly outraged by the fact that both the Commission and us have a limited scope to investigate the issue, “Redlich said.
“We are anxious to address the remaining concerns that exist in connection with that issue.”
Mental health support
IBAC Commissioner Robert Redrich defends the treatment of witnesses
Source link IBAC Commissioner Robert Redrich defends the treatment of witnesses