Guy Sebastian was accused by a Titus Day barrister as the lengthy trial neared its end.

Guy Sebastian is acting evasively while submitting evidence in a former manager’s embezzlement trial, and the court reports that some of the prosecutor’s closing remarks to the jury should be ignored. Was done.

49-year-old Titus Day pleaded not guilty to a series of charges related to alleged embezzlement of about $ 900,000 in royalty, performance, and ambassador income, allegedly owed by the singer.

Camera iconGuy Sebastian claims he is a victim of fraud. credit: News Corp Australia, NCA NewsWire / Gaye Gerard

After a six-week trial in New South Wales, Day’s defense counsel, Dominique Toomy, gave a closing remark to the jury on Friday.

Mr. Toomy told the court to get closer to everything Sebastian said in court with “very careful eyes.”

“Mr. Sebastian avoided answering me and was looking for the angle behind the question,” Toomy said.

“He was trying to see if that angle … would be in his favor. He was careful not to give evidence that he thought he might support him.

“There was a big difference between Mr. Sebastian’s answer to the question from the crown and his answer to the question I asked him.”

Downing Center Court
Camera iconTitus Day has repeatedly denied cheating, and Sebastian claims to have borrowed money from him. NCA NewsWire / Jeremy Piper credit: News Corp Australia

Mr. Toomy said Sebastian seemed to be able to easily answer questions from the crown, but had a hard time answering questions from Mr. Day’s barrister.

“In many cases, he (Mr. Sebastian) couldn’t remember,” Toumi said.

“He often used questions from me to start his own story, away from the topics he was often asked about.

“He twisted himself with a knot as evidence so as not to admit the existence of an agreement with Mr. Day. He himself to use the word” contract “in connection with the deal with Mr. Day. Couldn’t take him … Mr Sebastian believed if he acknowledged the existence of an agreement that might be against his interests.

Guy Sebastian turned to fellow Tim Freeburn (right) for help when calling Mr. Day to the police.
Camera iconGuy Sebastian turned to fellow Tim Freeburn (right) for help when calling Mr. Day to the police. credit: supply

The court was told that detective David Murphy, a police officer in charge of the investigation, had a potential conflict of interest in handling the case. Free burn.

Mr. Freeburn had cricketed with Constable Murphy, who had previously been allowed to verbally raise a conflict of interest with a police inspector and handle the case, but was free for social ties. He told the court that he did not receive a statement from Mr. Byrne.

Toomey told the court that police officer Murphy did not report in writing and therefore did not comply with NSW police guidelines for dealing with conflict of interest issues.

“I don’t know what he (President Murphy) said to Maggie’s Deputy Inspector,” Toomy said.

“He (Constable Murphy) was approached together by Mr. Freeburn and Mr. Sebastian, and he was charged within a short time of that approach.

“Detective Murphy couldn’t even say with certainty that he had reached the contract before prosecuting Mr. Day.”

Camera iconThe handling of the case of senior detective police officer David Murphy was criticized in court. NCA NewsWire / David Swift credit: News Corp Australia

Mr. Toomy said police officer Murphy saw what Sebastian said about Mr. Day as “the truth of the gospel” and admitted that he was “willful blindness” by not conducting multiple investigations related to the investigation. ..

The court was told that police officer Murphy was unable to contact a contract attorney or some organizations that said Mr. Day paid money on behalf of Mr. Sebastian.

Titus Day and Guy Sebastian in a happier era.
Camera iconTitus Day and Guy Sebastian in a happier era. credit: supply

Before Toomey began his closing remarks, Judge Tim Gartelmann SC instructed the jury, saying that some of the closing remarks by prosecutor David Morters SC should be ignored.

Judge Gartelman said in part of his speech that Mr. Motors misunderstood the evidence and asked the jury to speculate on Mr. Day’s guilt.

“You can’t act on speculation,” Judge Gartlemann told the jury.

“We must ignore all submissions made by the Crown based on the allegations that there was no explanation.

“The defense has no burden of proof. The accused is presumed not guilty unless the crown proves guilty … he does not have to prove anything and is not obliged to provide an explanation.”

The trial will continue.

Guy Sebastian was accused by a Titus Day barrister as the lengthy trial neared its end.

Source link Guy Sebastian was accused by a Titus Day barrister as the lengthy trial neared its end.

Related Articles

Back to top button