Tory deputy chair Lee Anderson ‘very angry’ small boat arrivals numbers may have passed 100,000 – UK politics live | Politics

The British government is considering tightening rules on investment in China after the US president, Joe Biden, announced new measures aimed at limiting the dollars and expertise flowing into sensitive technologies in the country, Anna Isaac reports.

Here is a request from a reader, prompted by the figure about 100,000 people arriving in the UK via small boats since 2018 being in the headline.

Please could we have some context for the number of small boat arrivals v the overall immigration numbers? I think I saw a suggestion that most immigrants are on business visas, specific country schemes or students, and that boat arrivals are actually negligible in comparison. Is this so?

The reader is right. The people who arrive in the UK in small boats are only a tiny proportion of the overall number of immigrants coming to the UK every year.

The small boat arrivals don’t even make up a majority of the people who apply for asylum. As the Home Office says in this report:

The majority of small boat arrivals claim asylum. In 2022, 90% (40,302 of 44,666 arrivals) claimed asylum or were recorded as a dependant on an asylum application. However, small boat arrivals account for less than half (45%) of the total number of people claiming asylum in the UK in 2022.

There was more information about the asylum seekers who do not arrive by boat in this Times story last week.

And asylum seekers as a whole – the ones who arrive by small boat, and those who arrive by other means – are still only a small fraction of the total annual immigration cohort. This report from the Migration Observatory provides a good overview. It includes this graph.

The exact proportion of immigrants who are refugees varies considerably from year to year, and the figure also depends on whether you just count refugees who claim asylum, or whether you include other types of refugees admitted to the UK on humanitarian grounds (such as Ukrainians). This House of Commons library briefing, published in March, has more detail. Here is an extract.

Asylum seekers made up around 6% of immigrants to the UK in 2019.

In 2020, when overall immigration was lower than usual due to the pandemic, asylum seekers might have made up around 12% of immigrants.

In the year ending June 2022, the latest period for which we have estimates, asylum seekers and refugees made up approximately 18% of immigrants to the UK. This includes arrivals under the Ukraine schemes, the Afghan relocation and resettlement schemes, arrivals in small boats, other resettled persons and arrivals on family reunion visas (around 190,000 individuals in total). If including the British National (Overseas) scheme in the category of humanitarian routes [the scheme for people from Hong Kong], up to 25% of immigration in that year would fall into that category.

Here is a question from a reader about the NHS waiting list figures.

Is the 7.6 million number of people or the number of operations? I am on the list for 4 completely separate ones only one of which I have a date for.

The 7.6 million figure relates to waits, not people. Technically it refers to what the NHS calls “referral to treatment (RTT) pathways” – cases where someone is waiting for treatment (which does not necessarily involve an operation).

That means that, if there are people like the reader who posed this question waiting for more than one treatment, they get counted more than once.

Arguably this makes the headline figure misleading, because the number of individuals waiting for treatment will be lower than the overall total quoted in the statistics. But the NHS does not have an equivalent figure for individuals, not cases, and the headline figure is easily understood, and does represent real people. Arguably if one person is waiting for four treatments, that is just as bad as four people waiting for a single treatment each.

This is what NHS England says on this point in the notes to its news release.

Each pathway relates to an individual referral rather than an individual patient so if a patient was waiting for multiple treatments they may be included in the figures more than once. Where we refer to the number of ‘patients’ waiting or starting treatment, technically, we are considering the number or percentage of ‘pathways’.

Yesterday Downing Street said Rishi Sunak believed he couuld stop the small boat crossings, and implement the plan to send people to Rwanda, without the UK having to leave the European convention on human rights.

Asked about this in his GB News interview, Lee Anderson, the Conservative party deputy chair, indicated that he accepted the government’s position.

But he said that, personally, he was in favour of withdrawal from the ECHR, and that if Sunak’s plan did not work, “drastic measures” would be needed. He said:

You only have to Google my name and put ECHR in and you’ll see where I stand on the matter and I’ve spoken about it in the chamber as well.

I’ve always been an advocate of leaving, but you know, we’re a team. And if things don’t work, if things don’t go to plan, then we’ve got to take drastic measures and I would fully support the government in doing that.

Lee Anderson, the Conservative party deputy chairman, has said he is “very angry” about the PA Media report saying that the small boat arrivals picked up in the Channel today may take the total number of people who have come to the UK via this route above 100,000 for the first time. (See 12.17pm.) The official numbers will be out tomorrow.

The Home Office data goes back to 2018, which is when small boats arrivals were first logged as a problem. The official database won’t include any people coming to the UK irregularly on small boats before then, and any migrants who arrived without being recorded.

In an interview with GB News, Anderson said:

I’m very angry about the number. Again, very angry, as you know, every single day when I see these illegal migrants.

Anderson also repeated his claim that people arriving on small boats are not genuine asylum seekers – even though Home Office data suggests that a majority of them are. Last year 90% of people who arrived this way claimed asylum. Most of these claims have not yet been processed, but of all the claims that have been processed since 2018, 61% have been accepted.

Anderson told GB News that the situation was “infuriating”, but that the Conservatives were the only party that could sort the situation out.

The number of people crossing the Channel on small boats in the last five and a half years could have passed 100,000 following fresh arrivals of migrants on lifeboats on Thursday, PA Media reports. PA says:

PA news agency analysis of government figures since current records began on 1 January 2018 showed that, as of Tuesday, 99,960 people had arrived in the UK after making the journey.

And RNLI lifeboats were spotted bringing dozens to shore this morning, meaning it is likely the milestone has been reached.

A witness said there appeared to be more than 40 people brought ashore onboard two lifeboats, which had attended a dinghy out in the Channel.

Data on the number of people detected crossing the Channel in small boats to enter the UK each day is published by the Home Office and Border Force.

The figures are published the day after and the latest update shows that on Wednesday zero people were detected.

Since the beginning of January 2023 to 9 August, figures show 15,071 people crossed the Channel.

George Eustice, the former environment secretary, was interviewed this morning on the Today programme. He was primarily there to talk about his opposition to the government’s plans on the installation of new oil boilers in off-grid homes from 2026.

Instead of encouraging people to install heat pumps, it would be better for the government to get them to convert their boilers to run on renewable fuels (like hydrotreated vegetable oil made from waste cooking oil), he said.

But Eustice also argued that this issue showed why the government should not be too prescriptive yet about how it will achieve net zero. He said:

We remain committed to net zero but where I absolutely agree with the prime minister at the moment is we’ve got to get there in the right way. And the reason we are aiming for net zero by 2050 is to create a strong pull towards new technologies, new innovations that will help us get there.

And the real problem we’ve got is groups like the Climate Change Committee, endlessly harrying the government to lock down prematurely the wrong kind of policy mix now which actually would jeopardise getting to net zero.

So we’ve got to keep the space for new technology and new innovations to come forward. And the failure at the moment is everybody’s on the government’s back asking them to lock down prematurely to quite possibly the wrong technologies.

Eustice said the government should achieve net zero “in a cost-effective way”. He went on: “And I think that’s why the current prime minister is right to push back against some of these things.”

The latest figures from NHS England show a small improvement in A&E waiting times and ambulance response times, PA Media reports.

• Some 74% of patients in England were seen within four hours in A&Es last month, up from 73.3% in June, PA says. The figure hit a record low of 65.2% in December. The NHS recovery plan sets a target of March 2024 for 76% of patients attending A&E to be admitted, transferred or discharged within four hours.

• The number of people waiting more than 12 hours in A&E departments in England from a decision to admit to actually being admitted was 23,934 in July, down 10% from 26,531 in June, PA says. The figure hit a record 54,573 in December 2022.

• The average response time in July for ambulances in England dealing with the most urgent incidents, defined as calls from people with life-threatening illnesses or injuries, was eight minutes and 21 seconds, NHS figures show. This is down from eight minutes and 41 seconds in June but is above the target standard response time of seven minutes, PA says.

• Ambulances took an average of 31 minutes and 50 seconds last month to respond to emergency calls such as heart attacks, strokes and sepsis, PA says. This is down from 36 minutes and 49 seconds in June, while the target is 18 minutes.

• Response times for urgent calls, such as late stages of labour, non-severe burns and diabetes, averaged one hour, 50 minutes and nine seconds in July, down from two hours, five minutes and 40 seconds in June, PA says.

Opposition parties are claiming that the latest hospital waiting list figures from NHS England (see 9.44am) show the government is failing in this area.

For Labour, Rosena Allin-Khan, the shadow mental health minister, said:

One in eight people are now waiting for NHS treatment, more than ever before. Patients are waiting in pain and discomfort for months or even years. Rishi Sunak has no plan to turn this around, he only offers excuses …

The last Labour government delivered the shortest waiting lists and highest patient satisfaction in history. The next Labour government will provide the staff and reform the NHS needs, so it is there for us when we need it once again.

And for the Liberal Democrats, Daisy Cooper, the deputy leader and health spokesperson, said:

This latest Conservative health secretary is not up to the job and owes the public an apology. He says his main focus has been bringing down the waiting list, but he is failing miserably, leaving millions in pain and discomfort …

This Conservative government should hang their heads in shame. Rishi Sunak needs to bring forward a proper plan to bring down waiting times as a matter of urgency.

Simon Byrne, chief constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland, has been urged to consider his position over the mass breach of officers’ data amid warnings that terrorists could use the information to carry out attacks, Aubrey Allegretti reports.

The government still has not achieved its target of getting rid of hospital waits in England lasting more than 18 months, today’s NHS England figures show.

Rishi Sunak wanted to eliminate 18-month waits by April. But the figures show that at the end of June 7,177 people had been waiting more than a year and a half for treatment, down from 11,446 at the end of May.

Today’s NHS England figures also show that 383,083 people in England had been waiting more than 52 weeks to start routine hospital treatment at the end of June – down very slightly from 385,022 at the end of May.

The government wants to eliminate all waits lasting more than 52 weeks by spring next year.

The number of people in England waiting to start routine hospital treatment has risen to a new record high, PA Media reports. PA says:

An estimated 7.6 million people were waiting to start treatment at the end of June, up from 7.5 million in May, NHS England said.

It is the highest number since records began in August 2007.

Rishi Sunak has made cutting waiting lists one of his priorities for 2023, pledging in January that “lists will fall and people will get the care they need more quickly”.

Good morning. Since the Uxbridge and South Ruislip byelection, in which the Tories held the seat unexpectedly following a voter backlash against the extension of Ulez (the ultra low emission zone), which will impose extra costs on some drivers, the Conservative party has been toning down its support for green measures considerably. Rishi Sunak even resorted to posing for a photograph in Margaret Thatcher’s old Rover, and promising to “max out” the UK’s oil and gas reserves.

But this morning there has been a bit of pushback from Grant Shapps, the energy secretary. In remarks that may be aimed as much at his party as the wider world, Shapps says there will be no global security without net zero.

Shapps made the comment in an interview with Politico in which he said that the UK will be hosting a global summit on energy security in spring 2024. Shapps said it would discuss the the need to “diversify from fossil fuels” and he declared:

We can’t have global security without net zero … There’s no global security if millions of people are having to uproot because of weather patterns.

The UK, and other countries, would be more secure with alternative sources of energy, he said. “Greater diversity could actually give us much greater security,” he said.

All of this sounds quite obvious. But in the Conservative party, and particularly in the Tory press (the Sunday Telegraph is calling for a referendum on net zero), these are not truths universally acknowledged, as a better writer would have put it.

In his interview Shapps also implied China might be invited to the conference. He said the details had not been finalised, but he declared he wanted it to be “inclusive in nature”. If China is invited, that may go down badly with some in his party too.

We are into the middle of August – normally death valley for Westminster political news – but, in so far as there are stories around, some of them relate to net zero. The TUC has published a report on the potential benefits of having a publicly owned energy company, and George Eustice, the former environment secretary, has given an interview about his call for the government to change its plan to ban the installation of new oil boilers in off-grid homes from 2026. For the third day in a row, Lee Anderson’s call for migrants to “fuck of back to France” is still being talked about. In Northern Ireland Simon Byrne, the chief constable, faces questions from the board overseeing the Police Service of Northern Ireland about the massive data leak. And Labour has accused the government of “catastrophic financial mismanagement”, claiming it has “lost” £251bn from the value of assets created to rescue the banking sector after the 2008 financial crash. Phillip Inman has the story here.

If you want to contact me, do try the “send us a message” feature. You’ll see it just below the byline – on the left of the screen, if you are reading on a laptop or a desktop. This is for people who want to message me directly. I find it very useful when people message to point out errors (even typos – no mistake is too small to correct). Often I find your questions very interesting, too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either in the comments below the line, privately (if you leave an email address and that seems more appropriate), or in the main blog, if I think it is a topic of wide interest.