Policy celebrities say defense and veteran suicide investigations will be just a stack of papers unless systematic changes are achieved, and more importantly, the service community is convinced that they trust the process. I can do it.
The Royal Commission on Tuesday’s Defense and Veteran Suicide has always heard that deep-rooted distrust among current and former members of the Australian Defense Force community is a significant obstacle to meaningful change across the sector.
Productivity commissioners Richard Spencer and Robert Fitzgerald said in a hearing in Brisbane that this is especially true for older new employees.
Spencer and Fitzgerald stood before an up-to-date review of the defense sector and an investigation that wrote obvious issues that hindered proper support for current and former military and female personnel.
The pair’s 2019 report – a better way to support veterans – is one of the 23 inquiries made in the last few decades, with 700 recommendations and little traction. It has been submitted to the government.
Fitzgerald never blames defense personnel and veterans, but suggested that the collapsed nature of the community means that consensus on drastic changes will always be an issue.
“The veterans community is one of the most diffused organizational communities I have ever attacked,” Fitzgerald told the commissioner.
“It’s unusual and determined by men and women … they see problems through a particular time of service, their particular deployment location, their disability or illness or the particular nature of the disability.
“There is a high level of distrust of everyone and everything in the system. This is a bit of a shock to anyone coming from outside.”
Fitzgerald emphasized that this does not mean that the former Services Organization (ESO) is unaware of the benefits of the proposed reforms and changes.
Rather, he said the fight was often between the desire to have a better system and the fear of losing what they already had.
“All reports are filled with the same reaction, especially for older veterans.” We want to make everything you say good, “they fully support our principles.
“But (they also say)” In fact, we don’t really want to change anything. More importantly, we want to keep all the benefits, even if the other benefits are better. “
“Now it’s not trying to downplay ESO, but it’s a very conflicting position when it comes to advocating reform.
“And that’s a consistent issue. At some point, we need to overcome this. We need to convince the veterans community that we really need to reform.”
The 2019 Productivity Commission report met with resistance from veterans’ groups when proposing new governance arrangements to promote the focus of veterans’lifetime well-being.
Fitzgerald and Spencer said that the ideal suite of complementary governance reforms is the Veterans Support System for the Veterans Services Commission, a newly established statutory body from the Department of Veterans Affairs to the Department of Veterans Affairs. It says it includes a transition of management. Future veteran support system.
The Veterans Support Policy was then transferred to the Ministry of Defense, creating a new Veterans Policy Group, retaining one Defense Minister and one Veterans.
“When implemented as a package, these reforms create a unified veteran support system with coordinated accountability and an incentive structure,” the report reads.
“Responsibility for the work of veterans is centralized in a single portfolio division, and VSC’s sole focus is on the management of the veterans support system, which provides with the national security objectives of defense and the duty of attention to its members. Balancing creates a clear scope of responsibility and improves strategic direction. “
Despite the potential benefits of the reform, Spencer and Fitzgibbon said there was strong opposition to shifting policy responsibility for the veteran support system to the Ministry of Defense.
Anyway, Spencer argued that focusing on “lifetime well-being” is an important concept in facilitating a smoother post-service transition of defense personnel.
“The transition begins on the first day of service,” Spencer said.
“The analogy is that sports organizations do not have different challenges in that their individuals are very, very involved in their way of life. They see it consuming it all. It is a passionate purpose in life.
“And I think many sports organizations and codes had to understand. How do you prepare those individuals when the moment is over?
“It can be done in a planned way of your own will. It can be done overnight.
“Early initiation of migration is a very important part of the process, not when it is happening.”
“At some point we have to overcome this.”: I hear the Royal Commission is distrustful of the big barriers to reform.
Source link “At some point we have to overcome this.”: I hear the Royal Commission is distrustful of the big barriers to reform.